Musings of a Product Manager
Kevin Schmidt's Blog
About Me
Archives
« December 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
  
       
Today
Click me to subscribe
Search

Links
 

Today's Page Hits: 565

Locations of visitors to this page
View My Stats
« links for 2009-8-29:... | Main | links for 2009-8-30:... »
Saturday Aug 29, 2009
Snow Leopard is here! My initial review.

My Snow Leopard DVD arrived yesterday but I didn't have a chance to install it until this evening.

I actually did an upgrade, upgrading a MacBook Pro from 10.5, and the upgrade itself took about 45 minutes.  One strange thing was during the middle of the upgrade the screen went 90% dim and I could hardly read how much longer it would take.  But alas everything completed without a hitch and the machine rebooted.

Since one of the perks of the new OS is improved performance, I had done a few very unscientific tests on the machine prior to upgrading and then did the same tests post upgrade.  The tests I performed and timed were:

After these tests I also looked at memory usage to see where things stood.

I did perform the tests on Snow Leopard twice since I was a bit surprised by a few the first time.  Note that in each case the tests were performed in order so everything started from a fresh reboot.

Action Leopard Snow Leopard (1) Snow Leopard (2)
Boot to login screen 40 33 35
Start NeoOffice 23 17 20
Open .ods in NeoOffice 10 12 9
Start Safari (apple.com) 8 5 4
Start Firefox (google.com) 8 8 6
Open Eclipse 17 36 19
Re-open Eclipse 7 7 7
Transcode WMV to OGV (wall clock)
4:52 5:14 4:51
Transcode (user time) 4:48 4:55 4:46
Free (GB)
2.43 2.03 2.14
Wired (MB)
153.5 304.4 162.8
Active (MB)
376.68 524.7 403.3
Inactive (MB)
45.21 157.3 310.7
Used (MB)
575.39 986.4 876.8
VM size (GB)
30.2 104.04 107.73
Page ins (MB)
243.07 916 224.6
As I said at the beginning, not terribly scientific, but at the end of the day it appears the only noticeable improvement is in the Safari initial start time which is less than I had hoped for.  I'll certainly be reading other reviews and looking for other improvements there might be in the coming days.
Posted at 06:51PM Aug 29, 2009 by Kevin Schmidt in Technology  |  Comments[4]

Comments:

Thanks Kevin for your tests and post. It helps me waiting for my DVD delivery (tomorrow ? )
Did you boot in 32 bits kernel or 64 bits ? 32 is the default.

Posted by Sebastien Stormacq on August 30, 2009 at 01:09 AM PDT #

I have an "older" MacBook Pro that I believe Snow Leopard won't boot 64-bit on. I tried holding down 6 and 4 during boot but it still indicates i386.

Posted by Kevin Schmidt on August 30, 2009 at 07:47 AM PDT #

Thanks for these "unscientific" tests, still we can manage to get a rough idea.
The whole concept behind Snow Leopard (apart from not running on PPC) is that it would be faster than its predecessor. It doesn't seem to be that obvious.
But an OS is nothing without optimized applications. We still need to wait for most of them to show up and see how they leverage this redesigned architecture.
Arnaud ZIEBA

Posted by Arnaud ZIEBA on August 30, 2009 at 08:39 AM PDT #

I agree that snow shutdown more quickly.. but I haven't seen any difference in time to mount/unmount.. and files copy... I honestly had to go come here read your review so I can spot what have been changed lol..

Posted by unlimited on September 12, 2009 at 02:40 PM PDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed