GIRI MANDALIKA's SCRATCHPAD

pageicon Saturday Nov 22, 2008

Oracle on Solaris 10 : Fixing the 'ORA-27102: out of memory' Error

(Crossposting the 2+ year old blog entry from my other blog hosted on blogger. Source URL:
http://technopark02.blogspot.com/2006/09/solaris-10oracle-fixing-ora-27102-out.html)

Symptom:

As part of a database tuning effort you increase the SGA/PGA sizes; and Oracle greets with an ORA-27102: out of memory error message. The system had enough free memory to serve the needs of Oracle.

SQL> startup
ORA-27102: out of memory
SVR4 Error: 22: Invalid argument

Diagnosis
$ oerr ORA 27102
27102, 00000, "out of memory"
// *Cause: Out of memory
// *Action: Consult the trace file for details

Not so helpful. Let's look the alert log for some clues.

% tail -2 alert.log
WARNING: EINVAL creating segment of size 0x000000028a006000
fix shm parameters in /etc/system or equivalent

Oracle is trying to create a 10G shared memory segment (depends on SGA/PGA sizes), but operating system (Solaris in this example) responded with an invalid argument (EINVAL) error message. There is a little hint about setting shm parameters in /etc/system.

Prior to Solaris 10, shmsys:shminfo_shmmax parameter has to be set in /etc/system with maximum memory segment value that can be created. 8M is the default value on Solaris 9 and prior versions; where as 1/4th of the physical memory is the default on Solaris 10 and later. On a Solaris 10 (or later) system, it can be verified as shown below:

% prtconf | grep Mem
Memory size: 32760 Megabytes

% id -p
uid=59008(oracle) gid=10001(dba) projid=3(default)

% prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -i project 3
project: 3: default
NAME    PRIVILEGE       VALUE    FLAG   ACTION                       RECIPIENT
project.max-shm-memory
        privileged      7.84GB      -   deny                                 -
        system          16.0EB    max   deny                                 -

Now it is clear that the system is using the default value of 8G in this scenario, where as the application (Oracle) is trying to create a memory segment (10G) larger than 8G. Hence the failure.

So, the solution is to configure the system with a value large enough for the shared segment being created, so Oracle succeeds in starting up the database instance.

On Solaris 9 and prior releases, it can be done by adding the following line to /etc/system, followed by a reboot for the system to pick up the new value.

set shminfo_shmmax = 0x000000028a006000

However shminfo_shmmax parameter was obsoleted with the release of Solaris 10; and Sun doesn't recommend setting this parameter in /etc/system even though it works as expected.

On Solaris 10 and later, this value can be changed dynamically on a per project basis with the help of resource control facilities . This is how we do it on Solaris 10 and later:

% prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -r -v 10G -i project 3

% prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -i project 3
project: 3: default
NAME    PRIVILEGE       VALUE    FLAG   ACTION                       RECIPIENT
project.max-shm-memory
        privileged      10.0GB      -   deny                                 -
        system          16.0EB    max   deny                                 -

Note that changes done with prctl command on a running system are temporary, and will be lost when the system is rebooted. To make the changes permanent, create a project with projadd command as shown below:

% projadd -p 3  -c 'eBS benchmark' -U oracle -G dba  -K 'project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,10G,deny)' OASB
Finally make sure the project is created with projects -l or cat /etc/project commands.

% projects -l
...
...
OASB
        projid : 3
        comment: "eBS benchmark"
        users  : oracle
        groups : dba
        attribs: project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,10737418240,deny)

% cat /etc/project
...
...
OASB:3:eBS benchmark:oracle:dba:project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,10737418240,deny)

With these changes, Oracle would start the database up normally.

SQL> startup
ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area 1.0905E+10 bytes
Fixed Size                  1316080 bytes
Variable Size            4429966096 bytes
Database Buffers         6442450944 bytes
Redo Buffers               31457280 bytes
Database mounted.
Database opened.

Related information:

  1. What's New in Solaris System Tuning in the Solaris 10 Release?
  2. Resource Controls (overview)
  3. System Setup Recommendations for Solaris 8 and Solaris 9
  4. Man page of prctl(1)
  5. Man page of projadd


Addendum : Oracle RAC settings

Anonymous Bob suggested the following settings for Oracle RAC in the form of a comment for the benefit of others who run into similar issue(s) when running Oracle RAC. I'm pasting the comment as is (Disclaimer: I have not verified these settings):

Thanks for a great explanation, I would like to add one comment that will help those with an Oracle RAC installation. Modifying the default project covers oracle processes great and is all that is needed for a single instance DB. In RAC however, the CRS process starts the DB and it is a root owned process and root does not use the default project. To fix ORA-27102 issue for RAC I added the following lines to an init script that runs before the init.crs script fires.

# Recommended Oracle RAC system params
ndd -set /dev/udp udp_xmit_hiwat 65536
ndd -set /dev/udp udp_recv_hiwat 65536

# For root processes like crsd
prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -r -v 8G -i project system
prctl -n project.max-shm-ids -r -v 512 -i project system

# For oracle processes like sqlplus
prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -r -v 8G -i project default
prctl -n project.max-shm-ids -r -v 512 -i project default

So simple yet it took me a week working with Oracle and SUN to come up with that answer...Hope that helps someone out.

Bob
# posted by Blogger Bob : 6:48 AM, April 25, 2008

Comments:

Good.This doc helped me.

I had one more question.

I have a 3 node cluster , which is already configured,

When I do a ps -ef |grep oracle withy Project details , I see it running with user.oracle instead of the default system project.

How can I setup it up that way?

Regards,

vijaykumar Kammar

Posted by vijay on December 23, 2008 at 07:00 AM PST #

Hi,

Thanks a lot for this blog...helped me solve a critical issue!!

~Kaushik

Posted by Kaushik Sethna on March 06, 2009 at 10:49 AM PST #

Thanks a lot for this blog...helped me solve a critical issue!!

Posted by seo on March 09, 2009 at 11:35 AM PDT #

tnx

Posted by Evgeny on March 19, 2009 at 05:41 AM PDT #

We were struggling with the same problem for two days.
This article is written in very precise manner and we could solve our problem.

Thanks for such a nice article.

Posted by Tanweer Khan on April 07, 2009 at 11:33 PM PDT #

Thank you for this great blog. I was trying to install an SAP - Oracle central instance and it wasn't going well. Very informative and easy to follow. Thanks much!

Posted by Rick on April 21, 2009 at 11:11 AM PDT #

Thanks for such a good and concise article

Regards
Lanto

Posted by Lanto RAZAKALALAO on April 28, 2009 at 04:49 AM PDT #

good doc

Posted by Babu on June 07, 2009 at 09:42 PM PDT #

Thanks this blog.
but I found there have some issue when set default project:

bash-3.00# prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -r -v 8G -i project default
prctl: default: No controllable process found in task, project, or zone.

but I edited the file /etc/project as following, it worked.

zone1 oracle $ cat /etc/project
system:0::::
user.root:1::::
noproject:2::::
default:3::::project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,2147483648,deny)

Posted by Jason Wang on July 20, 2009 at 08:10 PM PDT #

So Sun, in its infinite wisdom, took a process where all one had to do was edit one file and replaced it with this debacle?

No wonder the company died.
How does a change like this even get approved?

Lets take a simple, one step process and replace it with projects, multiple settings and even more commands with untold flags that one has to know.

Brilliant. Thanks.

Posted by Ian on August 12, 2009 at 11:13 AM PDT #

So Sun, in its infinite wisdom, took a process where all one had to do was edit one file and replaced it with this debacle?

No wonder the company died.

http://www.gifico.com
http://www.lv-cheap.com

Posted by louis vuitton on November 18, 2009 at 11:11 PM PST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

« November 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
     
       
Today

Feeds

Search this blog

Links

Weblog menu

Today's referrers

Today's Page Hits: 512