DAFT Report
Before the
LGUMC church bbq last Thursday evening, I announced there would be a DAFT meeting for anyone who cared to join in at 7:30, after dinner. No one remembered what DAFT was: Doubting Agnostics, Faithful Thinkers, D.A.F.T. which is just a silly name that I made up when thinking about the sort of conversations that I hoped to begin. Everyone, around a dozen people, who participated in the first three DAFT meetings in the spring seemed ok with this name, and we did indeed have some great conversations, exactly what I'd been hoping for.
After the bbq, four of us stayed for a meeting. We were two women and two men, none related, and we chose to talk about stories in the Bible or Methodist tradition that give us some sort of problem.
The most interesting exchange for me was in discussing the crucifixion and the idea that Jesus died for our sins. We all agree that it happened, but N. sees it as an example of man's inhumanity to man and rejects the notion that Jesus died for our sins (she calls herself a heretic). M. explained his view on the matter, and while I don't recall him addressing the question of dying for our sins, one thing he said did catch my attention. He described a scene in that Passion movie by Mel Gibson in which Mary is almost unable to go to Jesus as he struggles to carry his cross. I never saw that movie, and never will, but M. was very impressed with this scene. He said that Christ stumbles, and Mary sees her child in him briefly and is thus able to go to him in spite of her revulsion at the horror of his broken body. M. says that Jesus put his hand on her cheek and comforted her by saying, "I make all things new."
That gives me something to think about, because it seems an extreme example of the idea that we can find God in the response to bad things happening. I usually think of that in terms of natural disasters, but maybe it is equally applicable to examples of man's inhumanity to man.
I believe that how I practice my faith is more important than the details of what I choose to believe or not believe, but I very much appreciated talking with the three people who stayed to share their questions and thoughts about faith with me and each other. I hope to host a DAFT meeting after each Thursday night bbq for the rest of this summer.
From something I wrote in the spring:
What Does D.A.F.T. Mean?
DAFT is merely an amusing acronym that captured my fancy as follows:
Doubting Agnostics
Doubt tends to get a bum rap, as if it is a negative thing that should never cross the mind of a True Believer. Doubt deserves more respect! Doubt is not the antithesis of faith. Choosing faith while setting aside related doubts may be a better foundation for life in this world than blind faith that acknowledges zero doubts.
The term Agnostic is often confused with Atheist, but the two are not equivalent. An Agnostic is somebody who believes that it is impossible to know whether or not God exists, or that it is impossible to prove. The problem with the English word “know” is that it is so overloaded: knowledge of the heart? knowledge of the mind? some other sort of knowledge we cannot name? But the Agnostic believes you cannot know about the existence of God in exactly the same way you can know that 1+1=2.
So the term Doubting Agnostic is sort of self-referential, since agnostics certainly doubt lots of things; or maybe it is self-contradictory, making a double-negative leading to the positive alternative to choose faith, since scientific divine knowledge seems quite out of reach.
Faithful Thinkers
This one is easier, people of faith who enjoy trying to figure out how to apply faith to every day life, how to practice one's faith. In discussing this with my sister, she suggested I should call it “Faith Thinkers,” to indicate people who think about faith, who believe thoughtfully. I agree that works, but I wanted to imply Faith-FULL Thinkers, too: people who are full of faith and thinking about how to put it into practice.