enginebrainstorms

ozan (oz) yigit's noteblog at sun. all my text and photography is released under a cc attribution-noncommercial-noderivs license. all my poetry requires explicit permission.



20051020 Thursday October 20, 2005

aperture...

i will have to put in an order for aperture right away. it seems to me that this may well be the most important piece of post production software for photographers since the arrival of serious DSLRs. [i am also looking for any excuse to get off of the clumsy photoshop raw processing of my images.]

(2005-10-20 20:09:21.0) Permalink Comments [3]

Trackback URL: http://blogs.sun.com/plan9/entry/aperture
Comments:

It really does look interesting, but the system requirements are quite steep. I would really expect Adobe to answer this at some point, perhaps with Photoshop CS3.

Posted by matthew on October 21, 2005 at 01:07 PM EDT #

i agree. one reason i have not yet ordered is to first figure out what i can do to beef up my existing dual g4 mac. adobe will want to respond; the problem for them is to re-invent photoshop for the current dslr workflow. browser is a joke [which is why so many people are using bibble etc] perhaps another program? who knows. i have not upgraded to CS2, and am not really interested in spending more time in photoshop than i absolutely have to.

Posted by oz on October 21, 2005 at 02:16 PM EDT #

I currently use the Photoshop Elements 4 organizer/editor with an older rev. of Photoshop as a secondary editor. While there is no Mac version of the organizer, it really is a nice app. In my opinion, it blows iPhoto out of the water. Features Apple is touting in Aperture exist to some degree in the Elements organizer. It supports version sets so I can have a RAW/PSD/JPG all represented as a single "stacked" image with the ability to go back to the RAW at anytime. It supports stacks of similar images, even stacks of version sets. It will let you proxy offline images with a local low-res preview, create backups and a lot more. Considering it is consumer-focused, it has a lot of powerful features. I suspect Adobe's best bet is to get a more professional organizer built out from that code base and couple it tightly with Photoshop CS. If they also provide improved RAW support (non-destructive editing!!) I think they can do well.

Considering a Powerbook G4 is the only Mac in the house and the fact that Aperture does not yet support Pentax RAW, I have to stick to my current tools anyway!

Posted by matthew on October 21, 2005 at 03:48 PM EDT #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Calendar

« December 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
  
       
Today

Search

RSS Feeds

XML
All
/books
/design
/general
/humor
/java
/music
/opensource
/photography
/poetry
/programming
/sf
/skeptic
/tools

Links





Get OpenSolaris

Recent Entries


Navigation



Referers

Today's Page Hits: 234