enginebrainstorms

ozan (oz) yigit's noteblog at sun. all my text and photography is released under a cc attribution-noncommercial-noderivs license. all my poetry requires explicit permission.



20050511 Wednesday May 11, 2005

open-source effort is a terrible thing to waste...

there are many acts of stupidity that leave me nearly speechless, and the recent FSF/stallman calls for a fork of OOo (thus avoiding the "java trap") and a rewrite of java are amongst them. this clumsy eWEEK article has the sordid details.

when one is speechless, one's mind is moved into unfamiliar spaces. in this case, i had to think hard about the nature and role of FSF, and about new and creative open source projects in computing, two things at increasing odds with one another.

i no longer think FSF deserves the support and energies of computer scientists and open-source hackers.

in open-source computing, we are not supposed to waste our valuable resources in the increasingly irrational battles against each other and each other's licenses; we are supposed to be professional and smart, and we are supposed to produce good computing solutions to real problems that matter. we are here to make a difference, not slobberingly rework those things that already made a difference.

on the other hand, as my hero kenneth galbraith once put it, if all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.

related reading: robert j. sternberg, why smart people can be so stupid
yale university press, 2002.

(2005-05-11 19:00:39.0) Permalink Comments [3]

Trackback URL: http://blogs.sun.com/plan9/entry/open_source_effort_is_a
Comments:

Remember that RMS and the FSF aren't interested in furthering Good Software, they're interested in furthering Free (as in speech) Software. RMS considers closed-source software morally inferior to Free software; he judges software along this 'moral' dimension in addition to considering the more orthodox attributes like cost, performance, elegance, appropriateness, etc etc. So his software value map is different from a normal person's. I agree he's not worth time or energy, and that FSF doesn't deserve support (beyond the good work it does in projects that have orthodox merit). But I can see why he's saying what he's saying.

Posted by 70.49.89.246 on May 12, 2005 at 08:20 AM EDT #

RMS' political/economic agenda is childish and naïve. (not unlike RMS himself!) calling GPL software "free" is pure doublespeak -- FSF is dedicated to putting shackles on programmers, not freeing them. i can't imagine why anyone who supports free software would be sympathetic to an organization that stands for nothing more than putting software in a license jail. why did you, oz?

Posted by peter honeyman on May 15, 2005 at 11:41 AM EDT #

peter, this is a loaded question. <em>i do not use use GPL, nor particularly care for FSF.</em> on the other hand i did not think they were totally irrelevant; after all half of the open source world still rides on GPL, shackles and all, and sometimes it is hard to seperate the document from those who created it. alas, looks like it has become a bothersome and embarrassing detail of free software, nuttier and crunchier than ever.

Posted by oz on May 16, 2005 at 11:28 AM EDT #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Calendar

« November 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
     
       
Today

Search

RSS Feeds

XML
All
/books
/design
/general
/humor
/java
/music
/opensource
/photography
/poetry
/programming
/sf
/skeptic
/tools

Links





Get OpenSolaris

Recent Entries


Navigation



Referers

Today's Page Hits: 178