Web Analytics Analyzed
Strupp's Weblog
All | General

20050525 Wednesday May 25, 2005

Tagophiles vs. Logophiles tagophiles I might as well come out early and state my biases on the topic of page tags vs. log files. 

The more measured among us (yes, the pun is intended) accept the reality that both measurement approaches have their pros and cons, and that any business needs to evaluate its particular situation to decide which approach will work best for them.  And indeed there are now hybrid tools available that leverage both methods to give a more comprehensive view.

For a great, unbiased discussion on this topic see Brian's paper from Omega Digital Media.

But when you hear some of the almost religious enthusiasm that often occurs when making this comparison, I wonder if deep down inside everyone isn't truly a "tagophile" or a "logophile", and the wise just try to show a sensible facade.

Me frankly, I'm more of a logophobe than anything.  Previous experiences with log file crunchers have given me the scars to justify it. 

But  ask me again in a year or two and by then I might have changed my mind.
( May 25 2005, 08:30:34 AM MDT ) Permalink Comments [6]

Trackback URL: http://blogs.sun.com/pstrupp/entry/tagophiles_vs_logophiles
Comments:

When I think of logophile or tagophile I think of word or quota-holics and what our org calls people who design and write custom taglines for companies and or organizations.

Posted by edward w broderick on January 13, 2006 at 09:25 PM MST #

Is this blog still operating? I am interested in those considering themselves tagophiles. With all due respect there appears to be no updates. Where are the logophiles? With all sincerity, Edward W. Broderick Marketing to the World and beyond...

Posted by edward w. broderick on February 02, 2006 at 04:13 AM MST #

Guilty as charged! I haven't had time to add any entries for a while, but indeed the blog is still alive. Thanks for the kick in the pants. Got a few ideas been meaning to post. Maybe now I'll get to it! --The Author

Posted by Paul Strupp on February 02, 2006 at 07:58 AM MST #

Thanks Paul! We are just here to encourage. I look forward to your posts!

Posted by edward w. broderick on February 21, 2006 at 10:07 PM MST #

I think i'm definately a logophile, people seem to underestimate the amount of detail and business contextualised information you can get out of log files. Obviously you need the data in the log file in the first place but I find that if you have a nicely SEO'd website then analysing it is normally a piece of cake. Matt Hopkins

Posted by Matt Hopkins on May 05, 2007 at 07:25 AM MDT #

Those are good points Matt.

Makes me think I may have misunderstood this blog all along.

Thanks!

Posted by edward w. broderick on August 21, 2007 at 09:49 PM MDT #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Archives
Language
Links
Referrers