Chris Gerhard has already spotted this and posted a link to it, so apologies to Chris for nicking it.
If you liked the "Modern Major General" animation I posted about a couple of months ago, you might like this one - expecially if you're a Wizard of Oz fan. Nuff said.
In "1984" George Orwell famously referred to "Doublespeak"* (the use of harmless or preferably benevolent-sounding terms to describe things you really don't want done to you, for instance), and it often seems to me that, intentionally or otherwise, successive governments have learned it all too fluently. With no visible shred of irony, we have a Criminal Justice System (is it the system which is criminal, or the justice it dispenses, one might be tempted to ask); we aren't going to have an Identity (i.e. enforcement) card, we're going to have an Entitlement (i.e. the State deperately trying to give you stuff) card; we don't do 'shooting people' wars, we do 'peacekeeping' missions; we don't do "invasions", we do "regime change" And so on.
It might all sound like bitter rantings (and indeed it may be bitter rantings)... but I think we always need to be on our guard against Doublespeak, and call it out when we see it. For all that an ID Card is 'spun' as an Entitlement credential, there is an enforcement side to it, whose name deserves to be spoken. If the 'spin' says one thing and the law and policy say another, we don't get a true picture of what we are being invited to use and, more important, why.
More perniciously, it opens the way (perish the thought) for specious arguments along these lines:
Policy-maker: "Hey, Mr Public: do you want illegal immigrants and bogus asylum seekers to soak up your job and your benefits?"
Mr Public: "No way"
Policy-maker: "Oh, and do you want suicide bombers to make your commuting life a misery?"
Mr.P: "Umm.... no, I don't reckon"
Policy-maker: "OK - you'll want one of these 'keep me, my job and my benefits safe' cards, then"
Mr.P: "Yes indeedy... sign me up."
Policy-maker: "Oh, by the way, we're going to use this to index everything we know about you, and you'll have to pay for the card... but we can't tell you how much. Also, odds are we won't ask suicide bombers to show it to us, in case they blow themselves up."
Mr.P: "?"
Now, I'm not suggesting that's the argument that's taking place... but neither do I think we're getting a straight story about what ID Cards are intended to solve, how they will do so, and whether the cost of the problem outweighs the cost of the solution.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Updated on Sept.13th. Oops. According to wikipedia, 1984 does not actually contain the word 'doublespeak'; what it does mention are 'doublethink' and 'newspeak'. Whichever of those it is, the concept I'm alluding to is the one behind the use of "Minipax" for the Ministry of Peace (i.e. War) and "Miniluv" for the Ministry of Love (Secret Police). [Shudder]
Such views as I express in this blog are based on my own opinions,
experience and judgements. They do not necessarily represent the policy or views of my employer. It is not my intention to offend readers in any way. If you find anything on this blog offensive, please contact me in the first instance.
Robin Wilton
Robin Wilton
Links to recent entries
- Forwarding address...
- 100 to 1
- New paper on identity and privacy
- Home Secretary skates around question of DNA retention
- Coroner restricts jury's options in de Menezes trial
- Censoring the web
- No more animation
- Whodunnit? Commissioner Quick, in the office, without a warrant
- Liberty webcast on ArisID
- Police access to Parliament... the plot thickens
- ... speaking of which ...
- When to register DNA profiles?
- What does the Queen's Speech say about identity documents?
- Speaker of the House of Commons' statement
- New Wallander series on BBC
- MSc thesis on National e-ID cards
- The identity and privacy debate matures... gradually
- Horse, bolt, stable door, lock...
- The collision of traditional law and social networking
- Lords press for DNA deletion
- Blogroll
- Alan Mather
- Alec Muffett
- Bill Vass
- Bill Walker
- Burningbird
- CPO - Michelle Dennedy
- Conor Cahill... has an opinion or two
- Consult Hyperion
- Don't Panic - Trust blog
- Eric Mahe
- Eve Maler
- Geoff Arnold
- Gerry Beuchelt
- Greg Matters
- Hubert Le Van Gong
- Ideal Government
- John Sandell's Photography
- Kim Cameron
- Lauren Wood
- Ludovic Poitou
- Mark Dixon
- Masood Mortazavi
- Monkchips - James Governor
- New Drew...
- Oz Yigit's brainstorms
-
POSIWID
- Paul Walker's Getting His Coat...
- Peter Davis
- PlanetIdentity
- Stefan Brands
- Superpat
- Tatsuo-san
- Tim Bray
- Toby Stevens
- Tom Gordon
- Vikram Kumar (NZ)
- Wayne Horkan's eclectic
- del.icio.us
- delicious
- Bookworm
- 00 - "Qatar, 1949-52" by John Wilton
- 02 - Before the Frost, by Henning Mankell
- 04 - An Agent In Place, by Robert Littell
- 05 - The Flights of the Mind , by Charles Nicholl
- 06 - The Confusion, by Neal Stephenson
- 07 - Skinny Dip, by Carl Hiaasen
- 08 - Absolute Friends, by John le Carré
- 09 - Woken Furies, by Richard Morgan
- 10 - The White Lioness, by Henning Mankell
- 11 - All Fun and Games Until Someone Loses an Eye, by Christopher Brookmyre
- 12 - The Mysterious Flame of Queen Luana, by Umberto Eco
- 13 - Voices, by Arnaldur Indriđason
- 01 - Market Forces, by RIchard Morgan
- 03 - Quicksilver, by Neal Stephenson
Theme by Rowell Sotto.


Posted by TrustBlog on September 08, 2005 at 09:12 PM GMT+00:00 #