But I’ve been using Photoshop for years as my digital darkroom. I
probably only use a tenth of the features, and sparingly. My feeling is
that if one of my images requires hours of fiddling in Photoshop, then
it’s not a good picture and should be rejected. Mostly, all I do is
crop, adjust color balances, brightness, contrast, and saturation, and
in some cases add sharpening. Scans of my older slides will require a
some color compensation (some have faded or shifted), and dust/spot
removal. But that’s all. I don’t get into masking layers and other
non-photographic effects. That’s not for my eyes.
And as you’d expect, I’ve pretty much gotten it down to a routine,
where I can quickly take a scanned slide or digital image and process
it thru Photoshop and upload it to my photo blog in a manner of a few
minutes. But I think now the time has come to rid myself of Photoshop
and use Gimp for real.
So I’ve been deep into Gimp this weekend, reading the online help
and the many tutorials online (just Google “gimp tutorials”), trying to
develop a Gimp workflow similar to what I’ve been doing with Photoshop.
What I’ve discovered is that Gimp is slower than Photoshop for some
actions, but better for others. Knowing Photoshop helps a lot because
they are similar in many respects. Still it’s the differences that are
hard to learn. For one thing, the sliders on many of the adjustment
dialogs are not as nice in Gimp as they are in Photoshop. And not all
features have a usable preview mode, so you can’t always be sure of
what your doing.
I went thru my usual workflow with an Ektachrome slide from 1975.
Instead of conrolling the scanner from within Photoshop’s Import menu,
I had to run the scanning software (SilverFast AI) stand-alone and
generate a TIFF file for Gimp to open. Then the usual image
cleanup/color/brightness/contrast/saturation/sharpen/resize steps, and
finally saving as an 800 x 533 px jpg for uploading. The result is here.
I’m not entirely too happy with the result, and not sure if it’s my
ineptitude with Gimp, or with the image itself. And, I’m unmotivated
right now to reboot the system into 10.3.9 and try the same steps with
Photoshop, and compare. Not sure what that would prove either.
I may be ready to drop Photoshop altogether at this point. Just need
to read more and play with it more. But the images you will see on my photoblog will be processed by Gimp and not Photoshop going forward.
But
another issue related to the upgrade to 10.4.11 is what to do about my
asset management software. Up to now I’ve been really quite happy using
iView Media Pro 3. I bought the software a few years ago after getting
totally frustrated with iPhoto. And I’ve lived thru two versions of
iView until they were bought out by Microsoft last year. Now it’s
called something dumb like Microsoft Expression Media. And I won’t buy
it, or anything from Microsoft.
Luckily, iView Media Pro 3 works as is (apparently) on 10.4.11. But
I can’t expect any updates. It works really well, making it possible to
keep my 35 GB Pictures folder organized and easily accessible. And it
can do other things like create slide shows, bulk process images, and
keep annotated notes about each image.
So, what do I replace it with? I haven’t been able to find anything
comparable as open source software. I would prefer something I could
also run on OpenSolaris or Windows, as well as Mac OSX. And it be low
cost. Anyone know of anything out there? I’d like to hear about it.
Meantime, I’m bouncing back and forth between 10.3.9 and 10.4.11. At
some point I’ll see no need to be on 10.3.9 and use that disk only for
backup. The other programs that I use daily (Logic Express 7.1, Audio
Hijack Pro, Reason 2, Jam 6, Toast 6) all seem to work on 10.4. I’m not
willing to shell out more $ for upgrades every time I move to the
latest OS.
… and sometimes I start thinking about how nice it would be to throw
the whole kit out, forget about email and the web, buy envelopes and
stamps, get my old IBM selectric typewriter working again, dig out
the old vinyl records, close the blinds, and await Armegeddon while
watching reruns of I Love Lucy. I think the downfall of the human race
started with the touch-tone telephone.
But that’s another story.
10.5.6 will run perfectly fine on a g4. I highly recommend it over 10.4.11. backup via time machine is a no brainer, dtrace is nice and it even reads zfs;)
p.s.: max out the ram in any case.
Posted by bro on December 30, 2008 at 01:42 AM PST #
10.5 (Leopard) runs fine on PowerPC. It's advantages make it worth skipping over 10.4
Cheers, Liam
Posted by Liam on January 05, 2009 at 06:37 AM PST #