Podcasting the inside of Sun Microsystems, for those on the outside. I/O Podcast

e enjte Qer 17, 2004

There was a bit of fall out a few months back when Schwartz was quoted as saying that Red Hat is a proprietary Linux distribution. So, it's going to be interesting to see what the fall out is from the statement made by Matthew Szulik, Red Hat's Chief Executive, in an interview with Linux News, Putting Linux on the Desktop.

Szulik says, "If you buy the Sun desktop, you're going to buy into the proprietary Sun architecture".

Which part of the Java Desktop System (JDS) is Sun proprietary? The SuSE operating system, GNOME user interface, Ximian Evolution mail client, Mozilla browser, StarOffice (based on OpenOffice), or the Jabber IM client. For that matter, given you can replace any application with any other Linux application, why is this proprietary to Sun.

Perhaps he's talking about Java, which is bundled with JDS. Is he saying that the Sun Java is proprietary when compared to the IBM or BEA Java that they bundle with their Desktop? Seems very strange since they both do the same thing, and if someone wanted could install the IBM one straight into JDS.

It's also worth comparing the list of parts to JDS and what is bundled in Red Hat Desktop. Almost all are the same product, and all are interchangeable.

Makes me think that Szulik is just having a jab at Schwartz for his comment. Time for them to sit down together I think.
Comments:

Well, Real Player, Flash, Acrobat Reader, our MP2 DVD support (I think) and parts of StarOffice are all proprietary, as is YaST2 (albeit not for much longer). Not that this is necessarily a bad thing, because most enterprises would otherwise end up deploying many of those things for their users anyway.

Posted by Calum Benson on qershor 17, 2004 at 05:22 PD PDT #

True Callum. But only StarOffice has some proprietary parts ( see http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/mostfaqs.html#7 ), and it's questionable that these are Sun proprietary, which was Szulik's statement. Depending on your definition of proprietary, you could also argue that it's simple to replace it with OpenOffice.

Posted by Richard Giles on qershor 17, 2004 at 06:56 PD PDT #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.