All | 43 Folders | Accessibility | BoingBoing | Books | Computer Related | Family | Films | General | Hacking | Hobbies | Humor | Java | Links | Omni | OpenSolaris | Puzzles and Games

« Favorite BoingBoing... | Main | Favorite BoingBoing... »
20050905 Monday September 05, 2005

Team America: World Police

Dear blog, it's been over three months since my last film review, so let's rectify that now. I can't do that with giving away some spoilers, so if that doesn't butter your toast, you know what to do. I'll try to keep it minimal though.

My wife took our son out to the birthday party of one of his friends yesterday afternoon. I had the house to myself. I could do anything or go anywhere! What should I do? I seriously considered sleeping first but then decided instead to watch this "On Demand" movie made with puppets. The unedited version.

I went into this not knowing exactly what to expect. Team America: World Police had been described to me as Thunderbirds for adults. Well, I liked Thunderbirds when I was a kid. That sounds alright. I knew that the Director/Writer/Main Voice Talent was Trey Parker of South Park fame, but as I've never seen that (yes, I admit it) I still wasn't sure what that would give me (apart from some very profane dialog).

Did I like it? (Four letter expletive deleted) yeah! I loved that the strings on the puppets were visible (except for scenes like the romantic close-ups). The made up foreign languages. The complete over-the-top violence and senseless destruction. The dead pan humor. The musical numbers. The scenes that parodied scenes from other films. Just watching puppets trying to do some of this is hilarious.

I like the tribute to the old Thunderbirds shows. And the spoofing thereof. Is it just me, or does Lisa looked remarkably like Lady Penelope?

So what was in the unedited version that was different from the version that presumably made its way through theaters earlier this year? This was discussed on the IMDB web site (sorry, you'll have to register to find out). Interestingly there were four places in the film where I went Eeew! and I see they were all in the unedited version. Strangely enough the relentless expletives didn't bother me. Most of the sex scenes between Gary and Lisa I found funny rather than erotic or disgusting (if you've seen the unrated version, you can guess the two bits that I thought were gross).

Let's also not forget the character assasination of lots of Hollywood Celebrities and that "socialist weasel" Michael Moore. I thought the humour was just perfect, though I can't believe any of the actors in question were any too happy at this unauthorized use of their names. It's left me wondering how many law suits are now floating around because of this film.

If there was a poilitical statement to this film, then I entirely missed it. It has left me with a penchant to watch some South Park episodes though.

[]

( Sep 05 2005, 09:11:33 AM PDT ) [Listen] Permalink Comments [6]

Comments:

The political message in the film is that it's better to not get involved, and make fun of BOTH sides (of the Iraq conflict) than to take a stand and argue the issues. Which I disagree with, and which is why I couldn't enjoy the movie. (This is also what Ebert said in his review by the way.)

Posted by Tor Norbye on September 05, 2005 at 11:44 AM PDT #

Ah. Okay. Thanks Tor.

Posted by Rich Burridge on September 05, 2005 at 12:31 PM PDT #

I too found the movie hilarious. The message is more nuanced than "make fun of both sides" I think.

Posted by PatrickG on September 05, 2005 at 09:34 PM PDT #

IANAL, but I'm pretty sure you can't sue someone for using your name, especially if you're a public figure (like an actor).

Posted by Ben on September 06, 2005 at 02:32 PM PDT #

Hi Ben. Well it wasn't just the name, but what the actor puppets in the movie did. For example, the Matt Damon puppet was only capable of saying "Matt Damon" throughout the whole movie whenever it was his turn to speak. And I've picked one of the tamer ones.

But I suspect you are right. It'll also depend on the personality of the actor too.

Posted by Rich Burridge on September 06, 2005 at 02:44 PM PDT #

I think the attitude that just because they made fun of both sides, that they didn't _choose_ a side, is a little simplistic - some people don't want "their side" criticised; but the end of the movie made it clear they _did_ choose a side; but that their decision didn't mean (to them) that their chosen side was infallible/not making mistakes. It's similar to the difference between those who say "America - Love it, or leave it" and those who say "America - I love it, so it's my responsibility to try to make it better."

Posted by Geofry Glenn on September 07, 2005 at 12:48 PM PDT #

Post a Comment:

Comments are closed for this entry.