Friday October 12, 2007 Hehe, interesting page about the Roman calendar (from which ours is derived). The thing is an utter hack. Did you know that...?
Speaking of which: The above article mentions a pretty confusing English mnemonic, "Thirty days hath September...", to memorize the days per month. WTF? Never heard of it. You know what we learned at school?
Make a fist and look at your knuckles. Start at one knuckle (say, the one below the index finger). Count either a "hilltop" or a "valley" (between the knuckles) for each month. At the last knuckle (below the pinkie finger), you count the hilltop twice, and go back the same way. December will land you on the knuckle below the middle finger.
So what do you get? January, March, May, July, August, October, December are on a "hilltop"; February, April, June, September, November are in a "valley". Rule? Hilltop = 31 days, valley = 30 days, with exception of February. Much easier and more reliable. At least until the next emperor knuckles the whole system in the head.
PS:
I once read a fantasy story, the six fingers of time, about a guy who learned to fade into a time dimension 60 times faster than ours. He had the theory that the Babylonians (and other people from this dimension), who basically invented 'modern' time measurement, must have had 12 fingers. Or why else should they have used the dozen (12), the gross (144), 60 minutes (12*5) per hour, and 24 hours (12*2) per day, etc? Obviously it was as easy for them to count with 6 and 12 as it is for us to count with 5 and 10 -- right?
Well, there is a very simple explanation that doesn't require 12 fingers. All you need is 12 phalanges! A guy called Scott Reynen puts it very nicely on his page:
"The twelve months on our calendars, twelve hours on our clocks, and twelve inches to a foot all suggest a duodecimal (base twelve) number system, possibly derived from the twelve [phalanges] on the fingers of one hand (not counting the thumb). Duodecimal math is actually simpler than decimal math because twelve has more factors than ten."
Try it: Use the thumb as the pointer and point at the index finger's tip for one, its middle phalanx for two and the base phalanx for three, and so on. The base phalanx of the pinkie finger corresponds to twelve. This way you easily count up to twelve with one hand, while everybody else with the lame 5-finger system only counts up to 5! How stupid is that? Since I read this theory, I started counting with phalanges too, just to freak out the on-lookers with my incredible single-handed counting ability.
PPS:
You think the geeks' binary system is cool, where you count up to 16 by the fingers of one hand? Oh yeah? Well, the phalanx method at least doesn't make you to use a middle finger gesture for the number 4. :-P
Posted by seapegasus ( Oct 12 2007, 08:14:38 PM CEST ) Permalink Comments [3]