Social is Everywhere

How hard is it to put 2 and 2 together?

Thursday Dec 18, 2008

This morning I received a registered letter from a collection agent, urging me to pay a hospital bill dating back to June 2008.  Even though I am the first to admit that some payments might slip my attention, a hospital bill is not one of them, so I was intrigued.  My first reaction was to immediately pay to avoid further legal costs, but then I started thinking and I really could not recollect seeing this invoice.

So I called the hospital and asked them to confirm the amount and for what the invoice was.  After some questions we found out that this invoice was sent to my previous address.  As I did notify the hospital of my new address (my wife and I even were at the hospital registration before this invoice), the hospital agreed to waive all the extra costs such as interest and collection agent fees, providing I pay the invoice, which I did today.

Then I started thinking some more.  So the hospital sent this invoice, with my previous address, to this collection agent.  He obtains my current address  from the official registry, and sends me the registered letter.  Now shouldn't that already ring a bell at the collection agent?  He sees an invoice from June 2008, sent to an address where I moved out of in February ... 2007, and he is now sending this to my new address.

Maybe the collection agent could see this and alert the hospital?  So they can send the invoice for me to pay?  Would that not be the most logical and customer service oriented thing to do?

I believe so, but given the fact that collection agents make a lot of money doing this, and given the fact that most people have that initial reaction to pay the bill, I fear that the system is set up to allow collection agents to make money off people's backs...

Does anybody have similar stories to share? 

[0] Comments
Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg

Dear Santa: What I Want From My Cable Company...

Saturday Dec 13, 2008

This past week I received a letter from my cable company, announcing that my download speed will increase from 20 Mbps to 25 Mbps, and this at no cost.  I read the letter, and it went straight to the bin...  Why?  Don't announce something that will have no material improvement of my customer experience.  Let's face it, I will not notice this difference.  And this means that I don't want to know about this.

On the other hand, here are some examples of letters I want to receive from my cable company, which would have a very material impact, improvement duh, on my customer experience:

  • Announce additional HD channels.  I have a few at this point, and I enjoy them very much.  Soccer games, movies, series.  This will lead to additional customers, which in turn will lead to additional demand for HD channels.
  • Announce the possibility to watch Belgian soccer games.  Currently this contract is owned by the major competitor of my cable company, and I can not watch any games as I need to be a customer of this competitor.  Both companies are missing out on revenue.  They could be sharing the contract, allowing me to pay for specific games on PPV.
  • Announce the fix in recording a full season of a series.  Currently all re-runs are recorded as well, so I have to manually delete scheduled programming for re-runs of my favorite series.

 

These 3 announcements would be very welcomed, and would mean that my customer experience is greatly enhanced.  If by chance someone from Telenet would be reading this: stop sending letters which have no meaning. 

[0] Comments
Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg