Steffo's EcholotOnly technical stuff here. |
|
Wednesday Feb 28, 2007
Wanted: Identity Provider
Whenever it comes to a comparison between paper passport and an electronic passport it turns out that it is not so much a question of what data is stored on the new electronic passport, but how it is managed. There are a view companies that are able to manage a large amount of data, so that the availability of the data (e.g. for OCSP checks) can be guaranteed. But what about aspects of security? I prefer the state would handle my electronic ID (X.509 certificated, being identity provider etc). Unfortunately, I don't see any activities in that direction. If the state is waiting for industry partners to take the challenge, why are they keeping my normal paper based password records? Why don't we get X.509 certificated, when we get a new ID card? Is there someone taking electronic communication serious? The government cannot be responsible for everything, I hear officials say. Very difficult to tell where they should start and where they should stop. Here are a few points:
Steffo, everything is on the way. It'll take only a couple years until everything is rolled out because it's so complex. I see, I reply, and I know it's complex; but: we all know this since mid 90s and if it works in the military area why does it not work in the civil area? It doesn't work in the military area you say? Now, that's frightning.
Posted at 04:06AM Feb 28, 2007 by steffo in Identity Systems | Comments[0] Comments:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||