For those wondering where I've been, no, the Snowman wasn't searching for
colder temperatures. I've been enjoying my forced sedentary lifestyle
to catch up on some reading -- which necessitated being the last person
on the planet to read
The DaVinci Code.
About halfway through, I realized I'd read this story before, namely
in Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum. Eco's book pre-dates Brown's
by more than a decade, and Eco's writing (translated into English)
is both rich and dense, requiring skill and thought to appreciate,
much like a high-end chocolate confection. I'll admit to not
finishing Foucault's Pendulum because my reading pace
didn't allow me to made adequate progress through the book,
and eventually the wear and tear from toting it aboard airplanes
beat the book before I did. It's a shame my copy didn't get
frequent flyer miles or I could have sent it to Hawaii for free.
I'm far from the first person to recognize or react to the
similarities;
google "davinci code foucault's pendulum" and
you're greeted with a rash of conspiracy theorists and their
rankings worthy of amazon.com content.
The DaVinci Code is to Foucault's Pendulum
as West Side Story is to Romeo and Juliet. That
should suffice to upset nearly all literati, trade fiction readers,
and Jets fans everywhere (who are already worried, but that's another
story). But -- I liked the book. I finished it in two days. I
figured out how to carry it with me while hobbling on crutches, which
is something that I can't say for my laptop, the town newspaper, or
even the most recent ESPN: The Magazine.
By making secret societies and various shades
of mythology accessible to the general reading public, Dan Brown
scored a lot of points, measured by weeks on the bestseller lists.
There's a lesson here for technologists -- accessibility counts.
If it's hard to figure out, only a few will bother. Simple wins.
Have you heard about this dollar per CPU-hour utility we're building?
Simple wins, and it's accessible. Sorry, commercial message in the
middle of an itinerant literate rant.