picture of tech dogg Tech Dogg's Dox Tox

Jul
31

Does this sound bad to you: Someone started all this, and I'm gonna find them.

How about this: If anybody heard this story, they'd probably say it was untrue.

Or how about this: Every dentist and doctor in the city will be asked to donate some of their time to the free clinic.

More often, I'm hearing a plural pronoun used with a singular antecedent. Strictly speaking, or according to strict grammarians anyway, the three preceding sentences should read:

Someone started all this, and I'm gonna find him.

If anybody heard this story, he'd probably say it was untrue.

Every dentist and doctor in the city will be asked to donate some of his time to the free clinic.

You can guess why everyone is using a plural pronoun with a singular antecedent: they don't want to sound politically incorrect, or worse, they don't want to sound pedantic, or even worse, they don't want to sound pedantic and they're just plain lazy.

If you "correctly" use "him" only, you sound politically incorrect (or lazy), as in, every dentist and doctor in the city will be asked to donate some of his time to the free clinic. That's the custom anyway. Right or wrong.

If you use "him or her", you sound stuffy, pedantic, as in every dentist and doctor in the city will be asked to donate some of his or her time to the free clinic.

If you use "her" only, as in every dentist and doctor in the city will be asked to donate some of her time to the free clinic, you sound like Betty Friedan or maybe Divine.

What we're all trying to do is come up with a neutral pronoun that doesn't carry a lot of unintended social or political baggage. Short of creating a whole new pronoun, we appear to be bestowing the plural pronoun here with some verbal heft. If the trend continues, and I think it will, linguistic prescriptivists and descriptivists might find themselves slamming into each other on the same verbal track sometime soon.

Comments:

Yes, the use of the plural pronoun "they" with a singular antecedent in written English looks very bad to me: It smacks of lazinss and sloppiness.

With a little thought, all your examples could be rewritten to avoid offending the grammarians without appearing pedantic or politically incorrect:

Somebody started all this (all what, by the way?) and I'm gonna find that person.
Anybody who heard this story would probably think that it's untrue
Every dentist and doctor in the city will be asked to donate some time to the free clinic.

Posted by Paul Davies on August 01, 2007 at 02:47 PM PDT #

Started chasing Bourne (quote is from a promo for the new movie).

Posted by Brian C. Keith on August 01, 2007 at 10:32 PM PDT #

Good entry! I often battle with he vs she vs they vs (s)he :-)

Posted by Igor Minar on August 29, 2007 at 12:13 AM PDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Pick a Blog Date

Search

Play Tag

11g 2/08 3.2 adjectives adverbs antecedents barnes bill brands buyout cluster cobol concepts cousins descriptivists dialect disksuite docs.sun.com documentation domain download edition eqn eric express gates geographic global google grammar grooming guest heroes interview java job jonathan kissing larry layoffs ldoms linguistic lx manager massachusetts membership microsystems mood name native nbc new node non-global nroff open oracle page pagerank pascal patch performance plural prescriptivists product pronouns pronunciation quarterly quinto rac regional release reliability results runoff schmidt schwartz search sed sol solaris solaris8 solaris9 source speaker subjunctive sun syler technical technology television trends troff virginia wiki writer writing york zachary zone

Feed Me

See Also

Navigate