The Java Tutorials' Weblog
Eliminating Confusion
In my spare time I've been doing a remodeling project in the basement of my house. I'm not very experienced with power tools and such, so for my DIY projects, I rely on documentation and tutorials that I find online. Here is one such article, about replacing a standard light fixture with one that is flush-mount. Before reading this article, I had very little knowledge of how such a fixture was held in place. But after I read it, there is no way I could *not* understand it. Take a quick look at that article and you'll see what I mean.Being a technical writer, I found myself asking a few questions (not related to lighting) as I read this. Questions such as: "How/why is this article so effective?" and "Could such presentation techniques apply to what we document here in the Swing tutorial?" If you skimmed (or read) that article, you would see that the discussion is divided into sequential steps, to be performed in an exact order. Each step has a screenshot. Explanatory text tells just enough to describe what is needed, but does not go overboard (it focuses on changing the fixture, not teaching everything there is to know about electricity in general first!)
My current assignment is to re-write the custom painting lesson of the Swing tutorial. As it so happens, I'm trying a similar approach to the above: create an application that illustrates the various painting concepts, break its construction down into sequential steps, provide screenshots for each step, and narrate as needed. The whole point is to give you, the reader, a guided walkthrough that eliminates confusion as much as possible. I really like tutorials with a "Step 1, Step 2, Step 3" kind of approach. How about you? What kind of narrative do you prefer in a tutorial? What is it about the presentation of our own tutorial that you find effective, and what kinds of things would you like to see changed? If you've ever read a programming tutorial and found yourself still confused by the end, what is it about that presentation style that made it *ineffective*? There is no right or wrong answer here, I'm just opening this up to discussion. Maybe certain trends will become evident through your feedback.
-- Scott Hommel
Posted at 02:01PM Jun 25, 2007 by The Java Tutorial Team | Comments[6]
Monday Jun 25, 2007
Hi Scott,
Sometime back, I read a blog post by Martin Fowler on duplex books.
Most technical stuff that we deal with can get arbitrarily complex as we get deeper into it.
One approach would be to have tutorials at different levels, with each level abstracting complexity of certain layers. Within the tutorial of a level, the step 1, step 2, step 3 approach would work out very well.
Just an experience I'd like to share with you. Since a few weeks I am in the process of learning JSF for a project. I read some tuorials with the step 1... aproach, but somehow after reading all the tutorials I still had a hard time grasping JSF concepts when I got down to developing components. Off course this is not a fault of the step 1/2/3 approach. Maybe JSF has too many details, and it's tough to remember all of them. Also many details pop up as you write code. But this made me think that something as complex (and ghastly) as JSF would be a very good candidate for the duplex tutorial approach.
Perhaps for simple stuff a single level tutorial with steps would work out just fine, but for complex stuff, especially where the complexity unfolds as one tries to solve bigger problems, a duplex approach would work out well.
--
Regards
Parag
Posted by Parag Shah on June 25, 2007 at 08:45 PM PDT #
Posted by Paul on June 25, 2007 at 11:29 PM PDT #
Posted by Marcel on June 26, 2007 at 11:19 PM PDT #
Posted by Jonathan Di Trapani on June 27, 2007 at 12:31 PM PDT #
Posted by Chaos on June 28, 2007 at 12:15 AM PDT #
Posted by Terry Walker on July 04, 2007 at 07:57 PM PDT #