There's lots of traffic about the Indiana project on opensolaris.org at the moment - just about every opensolaris mailing list seems to have been copied on a recent email: seriously guys - get a room!

One of the complaints that is being made about the project, is the notion of it being "Sun derived" rather than "community derived". This argument is nonsense imho.

Belenix was "Moinak derived", Schillix was "Schilling derived" - I have absolutely no problem with Sun starting work on a distribution and setting an initial technical direction. A project has to start somewhere.

I have every faith that the folks starting the project will do the work on that distribution in the open, that the project mailing lists will reside on opensolaris.org and that lots of good will come of it. I also believe that if anyone genuinely wants to help, their assistance will be appreciated.

Now, if the community don't like the technical direction of the project, don't end up using the finished product (or even pre-alpha build!), then that's fine: the project will wither and no harm will have been done. If they do like it and think that it has value, maybe then, and only then, could the discussions start about it possibly becoming a reference distribution for OpenSolaris. It's really early days yet - let's see some bits first.

What I do object to, is people slowing things down, getting in the way and particularly damping enthusiasm - which is a rare commodity in my experience. Oh and (nearly most of all) crossposting - just stop it!


Comments:

Yep, you're right, the whole thing is nonsense. People are just stuck in their "Fedora/RedHat thinking", and for some reason have a really hard time comprehending that OpenSolaris has a different development model and different processes. So following this line of thinking, OpenSolaris must also "crank out a distro", but not just any distro - a "reference" one! Why? Because most people outside of Solaris circles think OpenSolaris is a distro. Nonsense.

Posted by UX-admin on June 02, 2007 at 09:10 AM IST #

Not quite where I was going with this line of thought - more that taking a "Build it and they will come" attitude may be the best approach, imho.

If the distribution is good enough, then it may have merits to become a reference distro. In the meantime, having installable OpenSolaris bits that have Sun resources behind them, and don't have to abide by the quality/schedule requirements of Express (which ultimately focuses on the next marketing release of Solaris) would be really interesting I think. I'd definitely use it, and I'll do anything I can to help.

Posted by Tim Foster on June 02, 2007 at 09:34 AM IST #

OpenSolaris is a pubescent child full of hormones trying to work out what kind of a relationship it wants with it's benevolent parent. It's looking for a few easy "buttons to press" but it Sun sticks to it's fundamental principles of "Share" and "Bridge the digital divide", then the child will appreciate the continued positive involvement of the parent. </analogy>

Posted by Kevin on June 04, 2007 at 07:43 AM IST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

This blog copyright 2009 by timf