20070809 Thursday August 09, 2007

links for 2007-08-09

  • OpenProj | Projity
    Ooh, this looks interesting. Open source project management Java app. And it's using the new Ad-ware license OSI approved, CPAL. No Mac awareness in it yet.
  • freedom ‘for users’- which users did you mean, exactly?
    Luis Vila latches on to the same issue with defining "software freedom" that I tried to get at when I differentiated between "co-developers" and "deployer-developers" in the context of open source.
  • Govt. Looks for Leaker on Warrantless Wiretaps
    "See, we need this warrantless wiretap law to help us stop people leaking details of our illegal activity"
  • Linux & Solaris booting together
    Watch as Ubuntu and Solaris both boot in LDoms on the same T2000.
  • Something must be done
    "Linux kernel maintainer Andrew Morton, reports ZDNet, was rather dismissive of OpenSolaris at LinuxWorld yesterday, inviting all to rally behind the cause of, er, monocultures."

technorati del.icio.us digg slashdot
Comments:

I think I missed the co-developer/deployer-developer discussion, Simon- have a link for it? Glad to know I'm not crazy :)

Posted by Luis Villa on August 09, 2007 at 02:26 PM PDT #

Hi Luis! I have a long paper in preparation about this, but the idea first surfaced in "The Other Side of the Glass"[1] and grew a little as I explored Payemnt at the Point of Value[2]. I actually think there are four classes of "software freedom stakeholder:
* Originators (I've also called them co-developers) who gather round the individual source commons;
* Extenders (I've also called them deployer-developers) who use the products of other projects to build applications, distros, extensions, plug-ins and the like;
* Deployers (your user-deployers) who take the results of the first two and put them to work in the real world, in the service of
* Users (your user-consumers, I have called them end-users elsewhere) who actually want to have stuff done and pay or otherwise reward the others.
Groups obviously overlap, but all four groups need their freedoms preserved.

[1] http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/the_other_side_of_the
[2] http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/software_market_3_0

Posted by Simon Phipps on August 09, 2007 at 07:40 PM PDT #

Ah, very in line with how I've been thinking about the open service definition. Great. Thanks for the pointers.

Posted by Luis Villa on August 10, 2007 at 06:35 AM PDT #

Post a Comment:

Comments are closed for this entry.