Care to elaborate on why those claims are "particularly spurious" as the page states?
Posted by
Swashbuckler
on October 26, 2007 at 07:33 AM PDT
#
Btw, if you want to bust the first patent listed you might talk to folks who created software that made WORM drives look like rewritable media, e.g. Corel. That stuff was available in the late '80s, early '90s.
Posted by
Swashbuckler
on October 26, 2007 at 07:36 AM PDT
#
Simon,
Care to elaborate on why those claims are "particularly spurious" as the page states?
Posted by Swashbuckler on October 26, 2007 at 07:33 AM PDT #
Btw, if you want to bust the first patent listed you might talk to folks who created software that made WORM drives look like rewritable media, e.g. Corel. That stuff was available in the late '80s, early '90s.
Posted by Swashbuckler on October 26, 2007 at 07:36 AM PDT #
Really I'd rather leave that to the experts. The PDF of the countersuit on Mike Dillon's blog is a pretty good starting point - see http://blogs.sun.com/dillon/entry/the_netapp_litigation
Posted by Simon Phipps on October 26, 2007 at 10:35 AM PDT #