Though the message arrived via email, I could hear the fervor in my friend, Richard's written voice. Email is funny that way. The perceived intensity reminded me of another episode, just yesterday, when one of my work friends flung open the door to my office, exclaiming, "You're supporting Obama?" with the intensity of a die-hard Hillary man.

But Richard's message wasn't about the heated race for the Democratic presidential nomination. It was about my Second Life, which he is struggling to understand in a way that many of my non-tech friends are. Of course, my non-tech friends, don't have the monopoly on virtual world skepticism. Many of my tech friends, and even I, sometimes don't get this Second Life thing either. Richard represents a group of my real life friends who follow my blog, and are simultaneously miffed and intrigued by it. As a consequence, when people see real world articles or references to virtual worlds, they think of me. I get lots of good information this way.

So, just what did Richard's email say? Like Richard, the email was somewhat cynical, very direct, and to-the-point. "So, are you helping the terrorists?" This one line was followed by a link to an article in The Washington Post, Spies' Battleground Turns Virtual.

The article starts off ...

"U.S. intelligence officials are cautioning that popular Internet services that enable computer users to adopt cartoon-like personas in three-dimensional online spaces also are creating security vulnerabilities by opening novel ways for terrorists and criminals to move money, organize and conduct corporate espionage."

This "bad things happen in Second Life" article, reminded me of a conversation that I had in the Second Life Sun Microsystems sandbox (I know...) with a Sun Second Life Mentor the middle of last week. He explained to me that there were "Sandbox Guardians," (think "playground supervisors"), part of whose job it was to keep order in the Sun sandbox. You see, sometimes mean avatars cause trouble in Second Life. Some avatars have armor and shields to help protect them from attacks. I don't have any such items and have no intention of acquiring them. Maybe I'm a Second Life wimp, but I figure, if the going gets tough, I'll just log out! Worst case scenario, my avatar gets killed, and I'll have to create another one.

Finally, as if Richard's and the Sun mentor's warnings weren't enough, one of my real life brothers sent me another scary Second Life article, The Fleecing of the Avatars.

Playing in virtual worlds carries some serious risks. I'm glad that people are looking out for me.

Just as my work friend doesn't really think I'll become a Hillary fan, Richard doesn't really think I'm helping terrorists. But, in the way that good friends do, both these men strengthen intellectual debate and cause me to think more critically about the world. And, when I use the word, world, I really, truly, and even, virtually, mean all of them. Truth be told, the fact that I now think in terms of multiple worlds is pretty scary in and of itself.

Comments:

Pattie,
Another good posting. I want to comment on one item in your posting: I was particularly impressed by U.S. intelligence using the term "personas" instead of "avatars"--a term that always makes me cringe because it stinks of banal appropriation of a term that is meaningful in another culture and religious tradition. And "personas" is, frankly, a more accurate term. Chalk up another one for U.S. intelligence.

I can hear people objecting, accusing me of being too sensitive, too patently PC, etc. ad nauseum (as in 'let me excuse my behavior by acting like a pitbull'), but to them I reply "you should be avatar'd & feathered!"

Keep up the good writing on all this. Your questions and discriminations always a joy to read.

Posted by Jeff Gardiner on February 08, 2008 at 01:05 PM PST #

From Richard,
"which he is struggling" which is Pattie's way of saying something nice about the way I'm trying to figure things out. Actually doing second life for me is just that a whole new way of approaching life in general. Getting older and tring to learn new ways of Living and being alive in one world while doing something totally different in virtual world. One would have to understand that I'm still trying to figure out the real world possibilities at 58. As Dad said to me growing old is not for the faint of hearts of the world. Actually he said another word but I'm trying to be polite.(another new idea for me.) But seriously Second life is a whole Brave New World. If what the article says is true what a shame it would be. So are there bad guys out there. Yes! Are they using Second Life for Bad Things? Maybe, Can we do something about it. You Tell me!

Richard

Posted by richard Greene on February 09, 2008 at 07:22 PM PST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

This blog copyright 2008 by Patricia Levinson