Out of the Woodwork

« A Look Behind NBC's... | Main | Help Duke and Sparky... »

http://blogs.sun.com/woodjr/date/20070424 Tuesday April 24, 2007

When Does the Real Privacy Backlash Arrive?

Big Brother is coming. And we're welcoming him. He's hiding in our email, our web searches, the banner ads that annoy us, and our kids' MySpace pages (that frighten us). But most of all, he's hiding in plain sight. You see, Big Brother isn't coming from secret government agencies shrouded behind dark tinted windows. He's coming from colorful buildings filled with bright young programmers who have whimsical company logos on their business cards.

I've written about this before. And now Google's agreement to purchase DoubleClick has gotten more people thinking about the company's privacy impact. Why? Because Google is gaining an even larger window into everyone's online activities. Rich Tehrani estimated that if the acquisition is completed, Google could end up with "access to the behavioral information of over 90% of web users".

Tehrani also provides examples of just how this data can be used, such as quoting a Yahoo executive who brags that his company can now "predict with 75% certainty which of the 300,000 monthly visitors to Yahoo! Autos will purchase a new car within the next three months."

So a handful of web giants are amassing thorough records of our online activities and learning how to turn that data into a full picture of our behavior (and likely future behavior). Scary stuff. Still, it doesn't feel like the general public really cares. Yet.

We haven't yet seen real public outcry and backlash against these privacy threats. Part of that is because the companies involved have good reputations (and deservedly so, in most cases). Part is because most of us assume that only "bad people" with something to hide have reason to worry about privacy. But these are just delaying the backlash, not preventing it.

At some point, a catalyst will grab the attention of the general public. It could be a security breach at one of the web giants, exposing so much information about so many people that we can't ignore it. Or it could be the story of how lost privacy has ruined one individual's life, told in such a way that we can't forget it.

I don't know what that event will be or when it will happen. But I do know it's coming. The giants of the Internet are on a collision course with the privacy of the little guy. And when it happens, it won't just be the privacy watchdogs that are complaining.

Comments:

Great article. It always chills me to think of huge government datacenters churning away against thousands of terrabytes of public information, and subsequently learning more about me, my habits and preferences, political views, etc, than I know myself. Added to that is the thought of men in sunglasses demanding priveleged backdoor access into Google or Yahoo's datacenters, and demanding it be kept quiet under threat of Bad Things Happening to Poor Sysadmins. It all fuels the paranoid spirit, and for good reason. Do we try to prevent that from happening, or do we do what spammers do, and add noise to the signal of our lives in order to evade detection by all the filters and data mining operations that will inevitably be set up to analyze our lives?

Posted by Greg Reimer on April 24, 2007 at 11:40 AM MDT #

Thanks for the comment, Greg. I've also wondered about the possibility of "digital chaff" becoming a popular way to protect privacy. I think it'd be a sad outcome in many ways. It's kind of the "nuclear option" for privacy protection in the participation age--potentially very effective, but also likely to destroy much of the positive potential of social technologies in the process. Hopefully we can come up with something which better balances the good and bad potentials of these things.

Posted by Jamey Wood on April 24, 2007 at 12:44 PM MDT #

Yeah, it would be sad. Kind of the anti-semantic web.

Posted by Greg Reimer on April 24, 2007 at 01:12 PM MDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

This is a personal weblog, I do not speak for my employer.